It is often that you hear people commenting on the absurdity of a person defending animal rights where human rights might cease to exist.
considering it absurd is justified by some, and un-accepted by others.
The perspective of some of those who justify it is that the efforts put in defending animal rights should be utilized into developing the human rights instead of being wasted in what is "Less important", I guess in this case, it safe to ask the human ego to "chill" a bit.
In anyways, right now, I am here to clarify the point of view of some of those who cannot accept that given justification.
It is common to be mislead into thinking that fighting for something automatically means you do not care for anything else. We all have our lists of priorities and we all have our fights, what is on top of the list for someone may not be what is on top someone else's list, that is something that everyone has to learn to accept in order for the society to develop in equilibrium.
Fighting for both rights is important, whether you choose to fight for one, both, or something else for that matter. in this case, both of them involve defending innocent souls, working to help them have a better life, working to provide them with an easier life.
A rescued Fighting dog.
I do what i think is right regardless of what others say. Animal rights is more mila'3wa9 than human rights because we eat them. Ba3deen It is possible to fight for both so i don't see the argument really.
ReplyDelete